Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Transform and roll out!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

RatCreature ([info]ratcreature) wrote,
@ 2008-03-13 10:55:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:disgruntled
Entry tags:lj, rants

argh, LJ increasing its level of fail yet again
So LJ discontinued the option for new Basic, i.e. ad-free accounts. Without announcing it beforehand, or even saying so outright in the actual news post (they used advertising speak describing this as "Other changes you may have noticed are the logged-out homepage and registration process for new users. We streamlined and simplified things so that now it’s faster and easier than ever to create a LiveJournal account." *snort*).

Considering how they pressed ads into more and more places and made them harder to remove also for paid users ever since the "no-ads" policy was first softened with the "Plus" account, like ads on the main site standard pages rather than just journals, this persistent snap.com hassle, all the "sponsored" communities and v-gifts, the "partnership links" like to MSN, and so on, I'm not surprised, but that they don't even realize that this is a major change for the site and its culture is disheartening.

And I've seen in comment threads a response "well, you can't expect a business to let you use up resources without anything in return, so it's no wonder they finally discontinued the ad-free accounts", but that completely overlooks that free users on a site like LJ aren't *leechers*, like say non-registered downloaders on a free file storage site, they provide the content that makes other users (some of those paying) and casual visitors (some of those seeing ads when browsing elsewhere on the site even if they enter the site through an ad-free LJ) come to LJ in the first place.

And maybe they did a cost/benefit analysis and decided it's not tenable to have free accounts anymore (not that they communicated that anywhere I could see, they seem to assume their users are too stupid for three choices in the sign-up and thus one needed to be removed), but it is just not true that they don't get anything in return for their services from free users. It may or may not be "enough" in their financial bottom line, but if all the free users connecting on LJ around a topic decide to go to elsewhere for whatever reason (better features, less ads, whatever), it's not as if the paid ones into that topic would stay either. For example, even while I'm not into fiber arts and crafts, even I noticed how many knitting-related things moved to Ravelry, and I suspect a ton of users who were on LJ mostly for knitting may have gone away completely, so now casual site visitors on the look for knitting stuff like a pattern, won't land through Google in some LJ comm and look at LJ's ads, but on Ravelry's site. A social site is nothing without user content.

This doesn't affect me much in practice, because I haven't created a new LJ account since I got my first one, and I surf with AdBlock on anyway, but it is still aggravating.



(Post a new comment)


[info]talespinner
2008-03-14 05:19 am UTC (link)
Yes, the level of fail at Livejournal continues to rise, even in the hands of their new owners. Is anyone really shocked at their decision to eliminate ad-free accounts? Any day now I expect them to start shutting down journals with 'questionable content' a la yahoogroups. Of course, when they do that, they'll be shooting themselves in the foot. More people will immigrate to sites like GoogleGroups and InsaneJournal and, within a year or two, we'll see that Livejournal has, once again, been sold. If the dedicated users were smart they would form a coallition and offer to buy out SUP when that happens, then address the longstanding issues with LJ such as censorship and crap customer support. But I doubt that will happen. No, I'm sad to say that I think Livejournal will wind up dying by degrees, until it goes the way of the dinosaur and the eight-track.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ratcreature
2008-03-14 08:04 am UTC (link)
What I found funny and didn't know when writing the post, but saw later, was that in the Russian version of the news post they announced discontinuing the Basic accounts clearly before it happened as important change. Okay unlike the ancient and now fully obsolete promise that there won't ever be ads on LJ I don't think anyone ever promised that there'd always be complete English site user-interaction to anyone, and it is now a Russian-owned company after all, and it's not like they give multilingual updates in languages other than Russian and English, but still. Maybe soon they'll use garbeled Babelfish translations from Russian to communicate with their English speaking users, that actually couldn't make things much worse, I mean, you could gather the Basic Account discontinuation even from the Babelfish translation of the Russian post, but it was omitted from the English... *G*

(Reply to this) (Parent)



Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs